The current round of fear of human-caused global warming really started in the 1970s.
Based on the best available surface data, from 1940 to the mid-1970s global temperatures
had been falling, creating fears of another ice age. Around 1977, temperatures suddenly
rose. At that time, the reasons for this sudden increase were not known.
Some scientists suggested the cause of the sudden warming was an increase in carbon dioxide,
and other greenhouse gases, that came with the Industrial Revolution.
The Climate Research Board appointed an Ad Hoc Study Group to examine the impact of greenhouse
gases on the earth's temperatures. The study group was headed by the noted American meteorologist
Jule G. Charney.
Their report published in 1979 was called the Charney Report. It estimated that "the
most probable global warming for a doubling of carbon dioxide to be near 3ºC with a probable
error of ±1.5ºC."
According to the Charney Report, there are two components to human-caused greenhouse
gas warming. The first component is directly from increased carbon dioxide and is estimated
from laboratory experiments to be modest. The second component of human-caused global
warming is an indirect, a positive feedback, from increased atmospheric water vapor, and
would be far more powerful than the direct warming from carbon dioxide.
Since, in 1979, there were no comprehensive measurements of atmospheric temperatures,
the estimates in the Charney Report could not be confirmed or disproven. But, since
it proposed the warming starts in the atmosphere, atmospheric warming trends would have to be
more pronounced than surface warming trends because much of the energy from atmospheric
warming is lost into space.
Unfortunately, there was pressure to take action before we understood the problem. Before
a method to measure atmospheric temperatures was developed which could be used to directly
test the greenhouse gas warming hypothesis, international organizations were being mobilized
to control greenhouse gases that were estimated, guessed, to cause global warming. The international
solution was to control carbon dioxide emissions. The conflict among scientists as to adequate
testing of the hypothesis became very public with the involvement of governmental organizations,
and the money started to flow.
Thus the resulting conflict is largely political, not scientific, and financed by governments
seeking to control carbon dioxide emissions for political reasons.
The U.S. government is heavily involved in financing the position that global warming
is dangerous and is caused by industry, transportation, and the generation of electricity by carbon-based
fuels. At the same time, independent research efforts are producing evidence that call into
question the fear of man-made global warming.
Two American scientists, Roy Spencer and John Christy, developed a method to finally measure
global atmospheric temperatures, needed to confirm the Charney Report. For developing
the method to calculate atmospheric temperatures, Spencer and Christy have been awarded NASA's
Medal for Exceptional Scientific Achievement.
But the data they've collected don't confirm the predicted result.
Independent researchers have tested the hypothesis
against atmospheric temperature data, now extending over thirty-seven years. The assumptions
in the Charney Report are not supported by nature.
The failure to find physical evidence supporting the assumptions about global warming is not
due to a lack of public funding. Because of the political, not scientific, impact of
global warming, the United States alone has spent billions of taxpayer dollars on global
warming issues.
You can find all the details of our calculations on our website, linked in the description,
but from Fiscal Year (FY) 1993 to FY 2014 total US expenditures on climate change amounted
to more than $166 Billion in 2012 dollars.
By way of comparison, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the entire Apollo program,
from 1962 to 1973 with 17 missions, and 7 of them sending men to the moon and returning
them cost $200 Billion in 2012 dollars. In other words, we've spent almost as much
on global warming as we spent on the Apollo program.
And that's just direct government spending (including tax subsidies). It doesn't count
the many billions that represent the cost of government regulations or the jobs that
are lost.
It's time to finally recognize the shaky science Global Warming stands on, and stop
spending massive amounts of taxpayer dollars on a highly questionable hypothesis.
For more infomation >> สู้!!ไม่ไหว!! - Duration: 2:12. 
For more infomation >> Making Money On Twitch, Vega Coming SOON, New Overwatch Maps -- Weekly Download #41 - Duration: 6:53. 
For more infomation >> ¿ CUÁL ES EL VERDADERO PODER DE TRUNKS GOKU Y BLACK GOKU ? Explicación Definitiva Parte 1 - Duration: 14:19. 
For more infomation >> 【Especial】Vikings: Ragnar & Lagertha - Amor e Arrependimento [Tribute] (PT-BR) - Duration: 3:29. 
For more infomation >> Experience a whole new world - Duration: 1:40. 
For more infomation >> 【いざ！就職★求職大進擊】就職生活大進擊─服裝百分百 - Duration: 2:06. 
For more infomation >> パリミラ＆タパ - Duration: 4:50. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét