So far, I have always been interested in health and how to be healthy.
I did not deal with diseases, drugs and medicine
it's not my job, I'm not competent nor interested in it.
For me, it's health first ...
And then, I became a dad a year ago.
It is the most beautiful experience of my life.
like all fathers, I was
confronted with the question of vaccination at one point or another
And frankly, I hear everything and its opposite.
This goes from the classical speech about the obvious
and the absolutely essential and harmless nature of vaccines
up to the most disturbing testimonials,
especially in my environment. I have examples around me.
I realize that in the end,
I do not have the elements to make a choice on vaccination, the famous informed choice.
And for my son, I want the best, the full health.
I do not want to make random choices, and especially not play the Russian roulette ...
We talk about free and informed consent,
so, since nobody seemed to be able to inform me without taking sides,
I started an investigation, I did my own investigation,
with all the energy that is given by the love for my son.
Music: "Shine" by Hicham Chahidi
I wanted finally to know what was the "truth about vaccination".
My opinion does not matter at the end, and neither my choices.
What I want is to give everyone clear, rational information
and based on scientific facts in order to make an informed choice.
I am not "anti-vaccine", I am pro-science, pro-public health,
pro-happy and healthy child,
so I will ask questions and try to answer them!
VACCINATION INVESTIGATION Episode 2: The composition of vaccines
We all want our children to be healthy, right?
I called my friend Alex to film my testimonial about my investigation
and that he can account for the path I had taken
to untie the truth from the false.
This film is the testimonial of this investigation,
it's my way to the truth about vaccination!
A: Cool, well, I can't wait.
T: We meet again for the 2nd session.
Did you process the first?
Did you understand what happened?
A: Yes, yes
T: Today, I suggest that we take a look at what vaccines contain.
What are the components of vaccines?
I explained why I had some doubts at the beginning.
I said, as a good rationalist,
I will focus on the components of vaccines.
As usual, you have your file, to get to work.
There are more than 30 pages, all the bibliographical references,
the scientific studies on which I based my research,
I will quote some, not all, and you can refer to them.
All links are there, you can check them.
And the people who watch these videos can do exactly the same.
However, do not mix the pages, because you cannot follow after.
The people who watch these videos can do exactly the same.
All references are below in the description.
A: And to be aware, this is a work of ...
A: And to be aware, this is a work of ...
T: 6 months of work A: 6 months, huh?
T: When I told you to come, it's been 6 months.
Because I wanted to do things good and, as I told you,
to put some distance between the dogmatic side of certain positions from both sides,
and to really have something to back up all things.
A: Good!
T: Shall we start?
So, I wanted to start, anyway, with a small thing,
in the field of vaccination,
to show that one can have a strict religious approach to things.
That is to say, we state facts,
without any evidence,
and I wanted to give a shout out to Agnès Buzyn,
who is our Minister of Health, who recently stated in a newspaper that
"We have the certainty that vaccines are safe."
A: The certainty?
T: It is harmless. Totally harmless.
Far from me is the desire to make "sensationalism" or to play on emotions,
but here is a testimonial, from a close person, which also explains why I started this investigation ...
Inoffensive: adjective. which can not hurt, which does not harm others.
Testimonial of Fanny My daughter Adele was growing normally
but today she is more than 80% disabled.
At the age of 5 months she received the third round of vaccine injection
with Pentavac and Prevenar.
In that day, while I was nursing her, I was pushed to get Revaxis.
It's a vaccine that is heavily loaded with aluminum,
but I did not know that,
and I was assured that nothing was going to modify maternal milk,
that there was no problem.
And for the record, the pharmacist who gave us the vaccines
confessed to me, from her own mouth
that for herself and her own children
she has always refused vaccines.
Adele began to vomit more and more,
she peed a lot
and after a month, she ended up being hospitalized
with historical infusions that have risen to 3.5 liters per day,
when she was only 7 months old!
So they were taking blood every 3-4 hours
to continually readjust the infusions.
I saw tons of doctors
who asked me each time to redo the chronology of what happened,
and every time I talked with them about vaccines
I was systematically told "You can forget! "
That was the big question mark
Since they did not know, they gave 4 broad-spectrum antibiotics
after that, she developed a Clostridium, so you can imagine the consequences ...
And then they made lots of images
including brain MRI with general anesthesia
after which she had a Cardiopulmonary arrest for 6 to 10 minutes.
You can imagine the consequences!
Finally, they quickly jumped to the genetic track
They begun with Bartter's disease.
But this Bartter syndrome that she showed
And which supposedly could only be of genetic origin
well, it disappeared in 3 days.
And after this spontaneous result,
they quickly rebounded, in less than a week, on another genetic disease
which is called mitochondrial cytopathy.
And since then, there have been lots of assumptions,
and in fact, they were persisting on this track.
We spent a lot of time in the hospital,
we met a lot of families,
a lot of children who became sick after vaccination,
and we are often told the same encountered difficulty
to link vaccines with diseases,
and even when the chronology was matching!
So what we saw was bronchiolitis, about 1 month after vaccination,
cancers, especially leukemias, around 1 to 7 months after vaccination,
type 1 diabetes, the last one was 15 days after vaccination,
and then Kawasaki, autism, and so on.
Today it's too late for us,
but we think it's very important to give our testimonial about what we went through, and ...
That said, we confirm nothing,
but we think that we have the right to ask questions.
T: So, you're going to tell me, what I showed you here, it's just one testimonial.
There are lots of Testimonials like that.
But if it was totally harmless, there would not even be a single testimonial like that.
There are lots of testimonials from parents like that.
It's among the things, that made me think.
And you have to know that on May 7, 2015,
the French Public Health Council
suspended the recommendation of the rotavirus vaccine,
it's a specific vaccine,
and the justification was:
they said they suspended it after "the notification of serious side effects, huh?
serious side effects,
including having been able to cause death after the vaccination of infants".
For them to have had to withdraw the vaccine from the recommendations,
there must have been a few cases.
And that's really the problem.
So when we talk about vaccines and children,
to put context a little bit,
I wanted to quote from a study, which really marked me.
The same, you have the reference.
The study says:
"Infant mortality rates have worsened
with the increase in the number of doses of vaccines usually administered:
is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity? "
The infant mortality rate has worsened with the increase in the number of vaccines.
And the conclusion of this study is:
"These results demonstrate a relationship that seems illogical:
nations that demand more vaccine doses
tend to have higher infant mortality rates. "
It's still quite definitive:
"Nations that demand more vaccine doses
tend to have higher infant mortality rates. "
And it's really relevant for us,
since, in France, we go from 3 doses, well 3 vaccines,
well, they are not even doses because they were already tetravalents.
From 3 vaccines to 11 vaccines.
A: Tetravalent, is it 3 vaccines in one?
T: 3 vaccines.
A: Okay.
T: We go from 3 to 11.
So, "the nations that demand more ..."
And they say, a relationship that seems illogical:
"Nations that demand more vaccine doses
tend to have higher infant mortality rates."
And besides, to go in that direction,
there is a German institute, called the Robert Koch Institute,
which did a huge study, which lasted from May 2003 to May 2006,
in which they studied the physiological and psychological state
of more than 17,000 children between 0 and 17 years old.
This is called a meta-analysis.
So they did not do it for the purpose of having information on vaccines in particular.
They gathered all possible information on the state of health,
the medical history of these children.
And then, there were researchers who, taking this data,
examined the areas that interested them in particular.
And so, there is an independent researcher, whose name is Angelika Müller,
who did a whole study (the same, I give you the link in your references)
concerning the state of health of vaccinated and unvaccinated children,
since she was interested in this.
So she took in the cohort of 17,000.
There are very few unvaccinated children, but there were still some of them.
And out of 17,000, she still found several hundred,
a sufficiently significant number, I believe almost 1 thousand,
that were unvaccinated, out of 17,000, and she compared their health state.
In the link, the plots are impressive.
You see that the state of health, in most of the diseases she has been able to list, the behavioral disorders, and so on,
unvaccinated children are much better than vaccinated children.
Here too, we are in a relationship that seems illogical, as the other study said.
You see, it's illogical, but the more you vaccinate, the less should be infant mortality.
The more you vaccinate, the more you have infant mortality.
Well, she found the illogical relationship.
She says "The data from the study ...
(so this study was called KiGGS)
repeatedly bring evidence that
unvaccinated children are in all aspects healthier than vaccinated children.
Effects of vaccine ingredients,
in particular the undesirable effects of certain toxic additives,
provide a logical explanation for this discovery.
Defamation of parents who do not vaccinate must stop immediately,
as well as the direct and indirect pressure to vaccinate,
for example, the exclusion of unvaccinated children from schools during epidemics."
She points to the effects of vaccine ingredients.
That's why I propose today to discuss the ingredients of vaccines.
We will look at what is inside these products that we inject.
Because, there would be someone who would arrive in the street ...
Imagine, you have a little kid, you have your son, you have your daughter ...
You may not be a father yet, but me, since I am a father now,
I can tell you, this is the most precious thing you have in the world, okay?
You have someone who arrives in the street with a syringe and who tells you
"I would like to inject something to your kid."
Normally, you will say
"What's inside ?"
something we absolutely do not do when we talk about vaccines.
We will begin to focus on what is inside the vaccines.
So, just before going into it specifically,
there is still a clarification that I would like to do because, for me,
there is a confusion that we will find at different times,
and that is very important to point out.
There is a fundamental difference
between a product that you take orally
and a product that you inject.
There is a fundamental difference between ingestion and injection.
And you'll see that, many times, in studies,
we compare doses of products found in vaccines
with recommendations for products that are taken orally.
But when you take it orally,
when you take orally for example a product that contains aluminum,
well, there is a big part of this aluminum
which directly goes in the toilet.
Because, as I explained to you,
on the surface of our intestines, we have an immune system
which is called the mucosal immune system,
and that blocks most toxic agents.
So imagine that you take 5 micrograms of aluminum, orally,
you can imagine that there are at least 4 micrograms that will end up in the toilet.
On the other hand, if you inject 5 micrograms of aluminum directly into the blood,
well you have 5 micrograms of aluminum that are in the blood.
And you'll see that in many places
including websites from the French government (Vaccination Info Service),
the two are mixed together.
From a personnel view, I do not think the people who wrote these articles are stupid
to the point of confusing between the two.
So for me it's manipulation,
it's malevolence,
it's taking people for fools and making confusion.
So, I really wanted us to realize that,
when you inject a product into the blood,
we bypass all the protection mechanisms of the body.
Completely. It is not the same.
A: Yes, that's it, It is not the same.
T: It is not the same at all.
drinking water that contains mercury, and injecting mercury into the blood, are not the same thing,
because when you drink water that contains mercury, actually,
there is a good part that is eliminated.
Okay? So, that was really an important point.
To see what vaccines are made of,
I took something that is a reference,
called the Physician Desk Reference PDR,
it is like a "Bible" of medicine.
You have the link in your studies.
It's renewed every year, the Physician's Desk Reference, the PDR.
It's the drug industry that says a little bit about all their products,
and all the compositions of these different products.
And we'll look a little bit at what are the main ingredients of vaccines.
So, in a vaccine, in general, what do we find?
There are attenuated pathogens.
Attenuated pathogens are things for which we want to vaccinate.
For example, we will take smallpox, either in live form,
there are live viruses and dead viruses,
we will come back to this in more detail in next episodes.
that is the attenuated pathogen that is supposed to start the reaction.
Then there are adjuvants.
A: And why?
T: why adjuvants?
It is to increase the reaction of the immune system.
These are products that will stimulate the immune system in a certain way.
That will justify, for example, the presence of aluminum,
which is a product that the immune system "does not like",
it is a poison for the body.
So it reacts and it will produce more antibodies.
Then there are conservatives,
there are excipients ...
A: Conservatives for what?
T: For vaccines, for viruses, so that products are preserved.
For example, when it's live viruses, it is to preserve them,
you need preservatives so that the product does not change.
And there are excipients, called bulking agents.
They are agents so that there is better absorption.
These are products that do not participate directly in the vaccine effect,
but which participate in the absorption of the product.
And there are toxoids, they are proteins,
toxic products, which also participate in the immune response.
Okay ?
So, what we call attenuated pathogens, it is indeed, according to the Pasteurian theory ...
We give a weakened version of the virus or bacteria,
to generate the production of specific antibodies.
no problem.
Then adjuvants and preservatives.
So, in adjuvants and conservatives, we will find:
mercury (we'll talk about it), formaldehyde, aluminum, ethylene glycol, phenol.
So, the goal is to provoke a stronger immune response than that which would only be caused by the attenuated pathogen.
So, if we take them one by one in detail.
Formaldehyde, if you type formaldehyde on the Internet: carcinogenic, neurotoxic effect.
I had to put some studies, but anyone who wants to take the trouble of searching ...
Formaldehyde was discussed a lot when it came to children's toys, for example.
There was quite a scandal about the presence of formaldehyde in children's products.
It is, by inhalation, a product that is highly carcinogenic.
If it is by inhalation, you can imagine that, by injection ...
A: It's even more so.
T: Even more.
We are going to talk about it, because after that, there will be the question of doses.
This is what the debates are all about, huh?
Phenol, many studies there too.
You type phenol, NCBI, Pubmed, phenol danger, phenol neurotoxicity.
Neurotoxic, major allergen,
it is behind many allergic respiratory phenomena in children.
Then there is ethylene glycol, so it's called 2-phenoxyethanol.
So, I did not find much that goes against this product.
I often saw that it was not an ideal conservative, in many studies.
So, I do not know what they mean by "ideal conservative".
In any case, they were not fans.
And then, we come across the famous aluminum.
So, we will talk about aluminum and mercury,
and I'm afraid we'll spend the whole session on aluminum and mercury,
because there is a lot to say about them.
So aluminum is an adjuvant that is used to increase the reaction of the immune system.
A: So, I have a question.
Because, if the body reacts to aluminum, wouldn't it react ...
T: So, no, it's more complex.
Aluminum will lead to an over-reaction of the body to the pathogen.
It amplifies the reaction of the body, indeed,
it leads, objectively, to the production of more antibodies.
Really, it works.
What is clear about aluminum is that it is toxic for the central nervous system.
And it leads to strong reactions of the immune system.
There are hundreds of studies on the neurotoxicity of aluminum on the Internet.
For example, I quote from one study, I put several in your documents.
I quote from one, which says:
"We conclude that the Alhydrogel ..."
(Alhydrogel® is the main licensed adjuvant for human and animal vaccines)
"We conclude that Alhydrogel® injected at low doses into the muscles of mice can induce, selectively,
neurotoxic effects and accumulation of aluminum in the brain in the long term.
In any case, the opinion that the neurotoxicity of Alhydrogel® obeys the classical chemical toxicity rule
*The dose makes the poison* seems simplistic."
So, they say neurotoxicity, and they even tell you,
it's not even the dose that makes the poison.
It's a lot more complex.
I did already mention it in the previous episode.
With these kinds of products, we are out of this notion of dose.
There are combined effects on which we do not have complete control.
So, on the neurotoxicity of aluminum
there is not a lot of debate at the scientific level.
The question of dosage is where we have debates,
because most people say yes, there is aluminum,
but very low doses and it's harmless.
So, we're going to take a look ... We'll have to do some math,
I'm sorry, but for you to understand the data,
we will have to look at the dosage questions.
So I quote from ... a study, for example,
that was done on what's called the Bayley Mental Development Index.
The Bayley Mental Development Index
it is a set of tests that makes it possible to measure the cognitive faculties of an individual.
These are tests of speed, association.
It tests the intelligence, in a way, of an individual,
but it is not a test of intelligence quotient, it is rather an active intelligence test.
And so, they say in conclusion:
"We believe that for children
who receive a complete nutrition intravenously
with an average dose of 45 μg of aluminum per kilogram per day,
the projected reduction in the Bayley Mental Development Index would be, on average,
one point per day of nutrition intake intravenously. "
I will translate. What they mean,
is that if the child receives a nutrition
which contains about 50 micrograms of aluminum per kilogram of body weight per day, every day,
he will lose a point on the Bayley index.
That is to say, every day, he will regress at the cognitive level. Okay ?
If we do the math, for a child of 5 kg,
5 times 50 micrograms, that's 250 micrograms.
That is to say, if he receives, every day, 250 micrograms,
well, on the Bayley index, at the cognitive level,
he will regress by one point each time he takes this dose.
So 250 micrograms is 0.25 milligrams.
We can show it on the video, it will be interesting.
0.25 milligrams.
At that moment, I say, OK, 0.25 milligrams,
let's see how much is in the vaccines.
You might say, there are certainly a lot less,
because we know that with this dose, the kid regresses at the cerebral level.
I go to the Vaccination Info Service website,
which is a website with the label of the French government.
It is an emanation of the French Ministry of Health and Solidarity.
And here, I come across an extraordinary thing
because they deal with the toxicity of aluminum.
Because, of course, it must have come back. I quote :
"Aluminum is the most abundant metal on earth."
So already, for me, it's not an argument.
It's not because it's on earth that you have to eat it.
Already, you see.
"We absorb it daily by multiple ways
and all food contains some of it
like vegetables and cereals.
Aluminum is also used for food packaging (drinks in cans)."
For a moment, you say, what do they want to tell me ?
You know, it's a little ...
"Thus, the quantities of aluminum from the vaccines are low ...".
So, it's interesting, they give values.
"... usually 0.2 to 0.5 mg per vaccine ...".
I remind you that the maximum dose is 0.25.
So, 0.2 to 0.5 mg, you can say that we are definitely at 0.5, and they say:
"... usually 0.2 to 0.5, and in any case never more than 0.85 mg ...";
0.85, we are at 3 times the dose. Okay ?
And what I find strange is:
"... compared to other daily sources of aluminum intake in the body
(3 to 5 mg each day orally)."
That's where I tell you, we compare vaccine doses, saying
"But it's not much because, every day,
you have 3 to 5 mg orally."
But orally, it's not at all the same thing!
It's not the same thing at all !
So 0.85 is 3 times the dose that is recognized as being profoundly neurotoxic
and leading to a regression at the intellectual level of children.
A: And that's what they say.
T: They give you numbers,
And then, technically, I do not want to be suspicious, but if you're told
"It is between 0.2 and 0.5 mg, and never more than 0.85 mg",
you can say "OK, we are at 0.85 mg, or even worse".
So, already, we are at 3 times the dose.
And we are not talking about cumulative effects.
We are not talking about what will happen ...
Because if we have hexavalent drugs, it's 6 times? it's 12 times?
I mean, it was said that *The dose makes the poison* is not applicable.
In the first study they said:
"The opinion saying that the neurotoxicity of aluminum
obeys the classic chemical toxicity rule *The dose makes the poison* seems simplistic. "
Ok, so if it's simplistic, what's really going on?
When we take 6 at a time, what's really going on?
We don't know. I can't answer you.
We don't know, I did not find anything to know.
A: Wow! That's crazy !
T: It's impressive, huh?
And, afterwards, when you see parents telling you:
"I have my child who has profoundly regressed after a vaccine containing aluminum" ...
Because most vaccines contain aluminum,
we'll talk about mercury right after
but most vaccines contain aluminum.
Well, you can say that, yes, there is a real neurotoxicity.
So, does that happen systematically, of course not ...
Well…
We do not really measure the decrease in the cognitive abilities of a child.
We can not really know, because most parents do not do this Bayley test,
that should be done just before and after the injection.
Most parents do not do it.
Major accidents, there is not that much.
But, how many thousands? We will talk about it.
We will talk about it. How many thousands?
And if it's your kid, you do not care if it's one from millions.
If it's yours, it's a disaster.
I mean, a child who develops autism-like disorders,
it's the life of a whole family that changes, in addition to his own.
So, you see, when you're told, yeah, finally, it's 1 in 1000 ...
Yes, all right, but if you were unlucky, what's going to happen?
And how can we rejoice in the collateral damage ...
We talked about aluminum ... So, if you want to do more research ...
I'm not going to emphasize too much on aluminum, because we already have proven neurotoxicity.
At the dose level, it's pretty clear.
But you can do some research.
There is a French team that worked on a disease called macrophage myofasciitis.
Saying it like that is not glamorous,
but you will see, they make it in connection with the neurotoxicity of aluminum.
There is another syndrome, called ASIA syndrome.
It is an inflammatory autoimmune syndrome related to vaccine adjuvants.
Again, there is a lot of research being done right now.
It did not seem necessary to develop more than that.
I think enough has been said about aluminum.
I would like now to have a few words about mercury.
Because there was a lot of talking about mercury in vaccines.
You have certainly heard about it.
A: Oh yeah. It's even worse than aluminum, right?
T: Yeah, we'll see, we'll see.
Well, when we talk about mercury,
we are talking about a product called thimerosal.
I'll suggest to put a picture on the screen, the bottle of thimerosal.
And on the bottle of thimerosal, we see a skull.
Technically, when you see a skull on something,
It does not mean "it's good, you can eat it".
There is a little warning already.
We will not eat it, we will inject it.
They'll tell you "but no! it's a question of dosage".
We will have to talk about dosage.
With respect to mercury, I have already listed more than 240 studies that prove that thimerosal is dangerous:
behavioral disorders, delay in speech, encephalitis, brain inflammation ...
There are a lot of studies.
Just type "thimerosal autism", "thimerosal encephalitis".
I listed some, but I did not want to put everything, it would have been useless.
So when you take the information,
what's called the Material Safety Data Sheet ...
The link is there too ...
This is called the Material Safety Data Sheet.
We see: mutagenic effects.
So, what is a mutagenic effect?
That means that thimerosal directly attacks the DNA.
A mutagen is an agent that changes the genome of an organism,
which will act directly on the genetic code of an organism
and which increases the number of genetic mutations of an organism.
So, "mutagenic effects for somatic cells of mammals.
there is no teratogenic effects.
There is no developmental toxicity.
This substance may be toxic to the kidneys, liver, spleen, bone marrow, and central nervous system.
Prolonged exposure to this substance may damage target organs.
Repeated exposure to a highly toxic material may produce
general deterioration of health by accumulation
in one or more human organs."
That's the data sheet of thimerosal.
Already, when you see that ...
A: it sends shivers down your spine!
T: it sends shivers down your spine!
A: I thought that mercury had been removed from all the vaccines.
Is it true, or ...? we always find a little?
T: It's more complex than that.
A: Okay.
T: Indeed. So, they tell you ...
There are many people who claim that mercury is safe.
I have 240 studies to prove the opposite.
Indeed, mercury has been removed from most vaccines.
So, if it has been removed, it's not for nothing.
It was because there were strong suspicions of problems.
It was not removed from all vaccines.
There is a link, go to the Vaccination Info Service website, which gives the values.
We realize that mercury has been removed from most vaccines, except two:
hepatitis B and the flu vaccine.
A: The two most common vaccines, almost, no?
T: In any case well spread, which are among the most common ...
It was removed from most vaccines.
So there must have been a problem ...
The flu vaccine is administered to pregnant women.
And for me, this is crazy.
When you go to recommendations of Vaccination Info Service,
They say who should be vaccinated against the flu,
they tell you pregnant women at all stages of pregnancy.
So, if you vaccinate pregnant women you also vaccinate the fetuses.
The fetuses take a dose of mercury, necessarily.
It is also present in the vaccine against hepatitis B, which is injected to newborns.
So, here too, it's funny because,
well, except if the mother has hepatitis B, and that's easy to know.
If the mother has hepatitis B, we know it.
Otherwise, hepatitis B, in fact,
it is a virus that is transmitted either sexually or among drug addicts.
After 2 months, the chances that the kid becomes polytoxicomaniac are limited,
and the risk of having sex at 2 months, again, normally,
if everything is balanced, it should be excluded.
So again, to vaccinate against hepatitis B at 2 months or 3 months,
I do not really see the point.
These 2 vaccines contain mercury.
Hepatitis B is a sexually transmitted disease, so why for a baby?
So the question is always the dosage.
This is where there is a lot of debate.
They'll tell you "mercury is present, in some drugs,
but in trace, but it's not that important"
A: Except that for a child or a newborn, the dose should be very small ...
T: We'll see.
So, if you go to the website of the French Agency for the Safety of Health Products,
you learn that there are 25 micrograms of thimerosal
by vaccine dose, hepatitis B and the flu vaccine. 25 micrograms.
The vaccine that we are going to give to newborns, for example.
There are 25 micrograms per dose of vaccine.
So, we also learn that the other vaccines do not contain mercury,
or contain traces of it.
So me, you see, in my head, I say: trace, what is it?
You know, it's a bit like when, sometimes,
when I'm going to the market,
you see people who have organic vegetable,
and then you have others that are not organic,
then I go to see them and say:
"Yeah, you do soil treatment, and ..."
"No, we hardly treat".
And I say all the time: "What is hardly, for you?
I want to know what it is for you: hardly."
Here, it's a little similar. I'm told, there are traces.
We have to see what it is, traces.
You see, there are traces and big traces.
So, I went to see the website of the Food and Drug Administration,
I give you the link, FDA.
And they say, "Vaccines with traces of thimerosal contain 1 microgram or less of mercury per dose. "
So when they really contain mercury, there are 25 micrograms,
when they contain traces, it is up to 1 microgram. Okay ?
If there is less than 1 microgram, we say, it is traces
and it does not appear as a vaccine containing mercury.
So, 1 microgram per dose of vaccine ...
I had fun doing some math.
I'll do it quickly. 1 dose of vaccine is 0.5 ml.
Imagine that there is 1 microgram, so there are only traces.
1 microgram for 0.5 ml, that's 2 mg per liter.
You can redo the calculation yourself, it's simple.
It's 2 mg per liter.
So, in vaccines that do not contain mercury,
there may be up to 2 mg per liter of mercury.
So now, let's go and see what are the toxicity, the recommendations,
at the level of mercury toxicity.
And I went to see drinking water, for example.
So, we agree, drinking water, you take it orally.
So, injectable, we should be well below.
But already, orally, the recommention from WHO,
it is 1 microgram per liter.
Here, we are at 2 mg per liter, that is to say 2000 times more.
In a vaccine that contains only traces,
there is 2000 times more concentration of mercury
than the maximum tolerated by WHO in drinking water.
And we are talking about something that is being injected,
compared to something that is taken orally.
So, I do not really understand how one can have 2000 times more without having a problem.
We'll have a little break.
Mercury was always present in vaccines.
And it is still present in the vaccine for hepatitis B and for the flu,
at a dose of 25 micrograms per dose for hepatitis B and for the flu vaccine. Okay ?
Even when they are only traces,
there may be up to 1 microgram per dose of vaccine,
which amounts to the equivalent of 2 mg per liter,
which is 2000 times more than the maximum dose allowed by WHO for drinking water.
Okay ?
Then, it was shown that the maximum tolerable dose ...
There is a study in there that proves it ... the maximum parenteral dose,
that is, injectable,
normally it is 2 micrograms per kg of body weight.
Do you have a question?
A: Yeah, so I have a question, because,
WHO puts all these numbers within reach of all people,
but they are not connected with doctors,
or those who make these vaccines, those who say ...
T: I found most of my numbers on official websites.
To have probity too in my research, you see,
I did not want to search in alternative websites that do not give their sources, etc.
Me too, I'm tired, because I think there is manipulation in both directions.
And I found anti-vaccination websites ...
because when I went to see pro-vaccinations, it was simple.
The basic argument was:
vaccination has saved millions of lives,
Shut your mouth, anyway, there are no questions to be asked.
Any debate is not welcome.
OK, so after I went to see the anti-vaccinations.
And among anti-vaccinations, I saw things that, for me, were totally wrong.
I said, but wait, that's completely wrong guys, your calculations are wrong.
So, I did the calculations myself,
and I went to see sources that were the most official sources possible.
So, yes, I went to see the WHO website.
What are the recommendations?
And I made my own calculations.
And so, in the study I showed you, they say,
parenterally, it is injectable.
Because, I found the norms for injectable,
they say 2 micrograms per kg of body weight. Okay ?
If you have a child whose weight is 5 kg, that's 10 micrograms.
When we inject a vaccine that is 25 micrograms,
it is 2.5 times the maximum tolerable dose parenterally.
So, we are above, far above.
You will tell me, but then,
does this injection of mercury actually lead to disorders in children?
I found hundreds of studies that show children's problems.
I quote ... I will quote 3. Okay? Randomly.
For you I did put more,
so that you really have all.
I will quote 3.
"This study presents the first epidemiological evidence,
based on tens of millions of vaccine doses administered in the United States,
which links a growing level of thimerosal from vaccines
to severe neurodevelopment disorders."
2nd study: "Highly increased risks
(according to sex, age, type of vaccine and vaccine manufacturer)
of autism, speech disorders, mental retardation, personality disorders, ataxia
and neurological disorders in general have been associated with thimerosal exposure."
3rd study: "These studies show that there is biological plausibility
and irrefutable epidemiological evidence
showing a direct relationship between increasing doses of mercury
from vaccines containing thimerosal
and disorders of neurodevelopment,
and between measles vaccines and severe neurological disorders.
It is recommended to remove thimerosal from all vaccines
and to carry out additional studies to produce a MMR vaccine
with an improved safety profile."
That is why, at the time,
the mercury was removed from the MMR vaccine,
but it has not been removed from hepatitis B and the flu vaccines.
If it did this much damage with the MMR vaccine,
you can imagine that with hepatitis B and the flu vaccines,
we are exactly in the same situation.
And I remind you that hepatitis B and the flu vaccines,
children and infants have it, since,
if pregnant women are vaccinated,
the fetus gets it as well.
A: Yeah, it's crazy.
And besides, if we removed the mercury,
it must be that they found out it was harmful.
So, why did they leave it...
T: So, what's funny, you see,
in this research on mercury ...
because mercury is always a topic for debates,
I came across studies that tried to prove the safety of mercury.
And it's very interesting because ...
I struggled a little with these studies,
because I really tried to consider the pros and cons.
I said, let's take a look on the other side.
And so, when I found all these mercury toxicity studies,
I said I will try to find some that prove the safety of mercury.
And I found some. At first, I thought,
how can I make both coexist?
There must be some bias somewhere.
And it's very interesting, because all the studies I found
proving the safety of mercury,
what did they do?
They were taking children who had just been vaccinated and,
after a few hours they measured the amount of mercury in their blood.
And they said: There is no mercury in the blood,
which proves that the body did eliminate it very quickly.
The problem is that if you take a look at the metabolism of mercury,
you realize that mercury is very quickly metabolized by the body
and it is stored in the tissues.
So, it's normal that they do not find it in the blood
because, mercury is stored inside the tissues.
I have not found any study that actually measures the amount of mercury excreted in urine,
which would really prove that mercury is eliminated,
because mercury is not eliminated.
Mercury stays inside.
The last controversy that I faced,
is a controversy concerning the nature of mercury.
It may be a bit of a specialist's opinion,
but as I know there are people who will watch these videos,
who will be specialized in mercury ...
There are various forms of mercury
there is ethyl mercury and methyl mercury.
methyl mercury is the one found in fish,
and you are told: pregnant women should not eat fish,
you will take mercury.
And in vaccines, it's ethyl mercury.
And what has been said,
and what I found for example on the CDC website,
It's the Center for Disease Control,
it's the health agency in the United States,
They say that methyl mercury is super dangerous,
but ethyl mercury is safe,
the body eliminates it. Okay ?
And in fact, it sounds good, I'd like to believe it, but it's wrong.
And I have a lot of evidence to support it.
I quote one, several even
but one in particular that comes from National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, in the United States,
it is an extremely famous science academy,
which has no less than 300 Nobel Prize winners.
So, this is not the club of the friends of Picsou Magazine, it is really serious.
What are their conclusions?
They tell you, "ethyl mercury", so it's the mercury of vaccines,
"Is probably slightly less toxic than methyl mercury in fish.
However, the database on ethyl mercury is still very weak,
This creates considerable uncertainty in comparisons between risk assessments."
So they say it's slightly less toxic,
but in fact, we do not know.
"Ethyl mercury and methyl mercury should be considered equipotent in terms of developmental neurotoxicity.
This conclusion is clearly protective of public health."
This conclusion should be kept for public health,
and conclusions should be drawn from this study.
"Exposure to ethyl mercury from vaccines
(added to methyl mercury exposures from food)
has undoubtedly resulted in strong neurotoxic reactions in some children."
These are their conclusions.
And then, they are carefull.
That does not stop the CDC, as I told you, from continuing to announce:
"Thimerosal contains ethyl mercury,
that is eliminated from the human body faster than methyl mercury,
and therefore, has less risk of harm."
It's false.
And then, I will not say a lot.
I do not want to overwhelm you, but do your research.
Thimerosal and autism, thimerosal and dyspraxia, dyslexia, dysorthography ...
all behavioral disorders, all spelling disorders,
all the disorders of dexterity that can be found in children.
And there is plenty, when you interview the parents, when you go to forums ...
When you see testimonials from mothers, troubles like that, there are a lot.
We have a product that is clearly present.
It's a bit ... imagine that you have a murder happening in a house.
You are the neighbor, and then, just after the screams related to the murder,
you see a guy come out at full speed through the service door.
And you go to the police.
You tell them: but I saw someone come out the service door.
And they tell you: yes, but we do not have proof that it was him who caused the murder.
You say, but wait, seriously, anyway,
arrest him, be careful, what! There is something there.
And here we have a product, which is recognized as highly neurotoxic.
It is known that it is as toxic as methyl mercury and so on,
we know that it accumulates in the tissues, and yet
we continue to keep it in vaccines.
We have 2 vaccines, the flu vaccine,
which is massively given, to the elderly,
but also to pregnant women, so that affects the fetuses.
We have hepatitis B, we vaccinate children with the vaccine against hepatitis B.
It is part of the cohort of 11 vaccines with which we will vaccinate children,
which contain 25 micrograms per dose of mercury.
We know that this is at least 2.5 times the maximum dose in a 5 kg baby.
We also know that there is large amounts of aluminum, we know all that.
We know that mercury, even when it is not present on vaccines,
it can be present in trace, and that, even in the trace state, it is 1 microgram.
A: And it's very harmful.
T: And it's very harmful too.
A: So, who is funding all these studies?
In the end, it's public stuff, it's ...
T: Yes, because there are public researchers, but we should not believe...
You know, I'm not doing demonization, I mean ...
A: In public, we are told very clearly ...
T: It depends. The problem is that it does not get past the research stage.
It does not get past the research stage.
That's why I did all this research work too.
Having done it for myself, I said, I must share it.
The data is available.
Just take the time to look for it.
We did not finish with vaccines.
I mean we did not finish with the compositions.
We'll stop here, if you want, because it seems to me there is already a good piece.
T: Yeah, the head is going to explode. We will continue next time.
We will not only study other things found in vaccines.
You'll see, we do not expect to find them.
We will talk about glyphosate, for example.
Glyphosate is produced by Monsanto, we say, isn't it a major pesticide?
We will find it in vaccines. Well,
And then we'll talk about how vaccines are evaluated.
Who evaluates vaccines before they are put in the market?
You will see some surprises.
Maybe there is a major conflict of interest.
A: Oh really? Are you sure ?
T: Yeah, we'll see. It's okay ?
A: Yeah, it works.
T: A piece of coconut? Mercury-free guaranteed.
To boost morale
and continue to make informed choices.
Cheers!
For more infomation >> Единственный путь, чтобы найти Иисуса. - Duration: 1:07. 
For more infomation >> Thầy Ba Đi Tải Đạn Địch Bắt :) . Câu Chuyện Về SGD Thay Đổi Chữ Cái - Duration: 14:09. 
For more infomation >> [TOOZI]😝 MIX PERLER BEADS WITH CLEAR SLIME! BEAUTIFUL SLIME! - Duration: 4:21. 
For more infomation >> Edat "kadar" (A2) - Learn Turkish Particle "kadar" - Duration: 2:46. 
For more infomation >> 2018 金馬影展TGHFF | 如果麥子消失 Grain - Duration: 2:06. 
For more infomation >> Phim ngắn | Thiếu gia ăn chơi phải lòng em gái phục vụ | Tập 2 - samytv - Duration: 9:47. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét